Underwater Acoustic Tag (NDA)

2-minute full case study (the scroll-through / deep dive)

View Gallery

Context & users

Field teams needed a compact underwater recorder that stays oriented, resists pressure, and can be attached and retrieved reliably without specialist tools. Goal: a repeatable, low-profile package that extends recording time and simplifies deployment.

Requirements / constraints

  • Thin form factor; smooth exterior to minimize snags/drag

  • Predictable orientation (CG CB), tolerant of minor payload variation

  • * no * Ingress resistance via a serviceable seal (no permanent potting for routine maintenance)

  • Mounting that works on varied substrates/harnesses; protected cable/connector strain-relief

  • Materials and processes suitable for short-run molding and fast iteration

Solution architecture (sanitized)

  • Multicomponent molded polymer housing (main shell + cover + gasket groove)

  • Serviceable seal: O-ring/gasket stack with compression stops and generous lead-ins

  • Internal ballast pockets to trim CG; modular board standoffs to control stack height

  • External mounting flats/slots compatible with straps or brackets; recessed fasteners

  • Routed cable path with strain-relief features and drip loop

Engineering highlights

  • CG/ballast tuning: Spreadsheet + benchtop tank trials to set a ballast map and trim angle; targeted neutral/slightly negative buoyancy for predictable handling

  • Molding for repeatability: Draft, radii, and gate locations chosen to reduce warp; indexed features for assembly alignment; documented de-mold steps

  • Seal design: Groove dimensions set for target compression; corner radii to avoid pinch; tactile check for full seating; light-grease spec to reduce stick-slip

  • PCB/mech integration: Board keep-outs respected; standoffs + washers manage compression; cable gland spec’d for pull-out and bend radius

Build & validation testing

  • Buoyancy & balance: Tank tests (fresh and salt) to verify orientation, trim angle, and stability during gentle tow

  • Pressure checks: Pressure-pot/column to target depth equivalent; inspected for leak paths and post-test mass gain

  • Hydrodynamics: Simple tow test to gauge drag and side-slip; adjusted leading edges and mounting position

  • Attachment trials: Strap/adhesive/standoff options compared for install time, shear/peel behavior, and serviceability

Results (sanitized)

  • Stability: Consistent orientation in tank tests; reduced roll/rocking versus prior layout

  • Endurance: Packaging changes enabled longer recording time (thermal path + battery-volume efficiency)

  • Repeatability: Molding/assembly steps documented; fast, consistent closes with even seal compression

  • Readiness: Passed internal buoyancy and pressure checks to program targets; improved handling via protected strain-relief

What I’d improve next

  • Formalize IP-style ingress tests and UV/salt-fog exposure; add debris guards at cable entry

  • Tool-less latch option to speed field swaps; standardize hardware to two driver types

  • Expand environmental matrix (temperature, long-duration soak, repeated deploy/retrieval cycles)